1BUV Global News No Ads or Trackers
No Ads or Trackers
Racial Justice vs. The Israel Lobby: When Being Pro-Palestine Becomes the New Normal

Biden Keeps the US Mired in the Middle East

US foreign policy has been consumed by hawkish obsessions in the Middle East
for the last thirty years, and the next decade promises more of the same. Despite
repeated claims over the last decade that the US is “retreating” from
the region, one administration after another keeps our country mired in its
conflicts and rivalries. There is a conventional view that every president since
George W. Bush has sought to extricate the US from Middle Eastern conflicts,
but the record shows that each one has recommitted the US to fighting and supporting
unnecessary and illegal wars. Each one has gone out of his way to “reassure”
US clients that nothing is changing. The Biden administration is proving to
be no different than its predecessors on both counts.

For all their talk of focusing US attention on East Asia, the Biden administration
refuses to reduce US involvement in the Middle East. Brett McGurk, the official
responsible for coordinating Biden administration policy for the Middle East
and North Africa, said
as much in a recent speech at a security conference in Bahrain: “The United
States is not going anywhere. This region is too important, too volatile, too
interwoven with American interests to contemplate otherwise.” The first
part of his statement may be true, but the reasons he gave for it are not.

The Middle East’s importance to the United States has diminished over time,
and it is arguably less important for US security today than at any other point
since WWII. To the extent that the region is “volatile,” that has
often been because of destabilizing US and client policies. The US could afford
to greatly reduce or even end its military footprint in the region with no significant
adverse effects on our security. Doing that could finally free the US from the
obsessions with Iran, Israel, and terrorism that have warped our foreign policy
for decades. More important, it could reduce our exposure to regional rivalries
and end our complicity in the appalling abuses of despotic clients.

Real retrenchment would allow the US to have more balanced relations with all
states and more normal relationships with states that have taken automatic US
backing for granted. The region would likely be less volatile once it is no
longer the locus of the obsessions of a superpower, and the US would no longer
automatically treat the enemies of its clients as its own. US military withdrawal
from the Middle East is almost certain to mean a more peaceful and stable Middle
East, or at least one no less stable than any other part of the world. It will
all but guarantee that the US fights no more Middle Eastern wars.

The obstacles to withdrawal are considerable, and perhaps the biggest one is
the unwillingness of any president to commit to it. The New York Times
published a story
last week that carried the same message as McGurk’s speech: the Biden administration
is trying to convince Arab “allies” that it isn’t abandoning them.
The clients need not have bothered to feign worry, since it appears that Biden
was never serious about reducing the US role in the region. Almost everything
Biden has done this year has been to embrace and shore up the status quo, and
the latest professions of support from McGurk and Defense Secretary Austin are
more proof that bankrupt US policies in the Middle East will stay the same.
“America is back” to its same old tricks.

US clients periodically pretend to worry that the US will end its support for
them, but they usually do this in order to extract promises of additional support.
Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates all made lots of noise during
the Obama years that they were feeling neglected by Washington, and to quiet
them down Obama showered them with record-setting supplies of weapons. Worse
still, Obama backed the Saudi-led war on Yemen to demonstrate that they could
still rely on US backing. More than six years and several hundred thousand dead
Yemenis later, the Saudi coalition is losing their war and the US remains complicit
in the destruction of Yemen. That is what “reassuring” bad clients
gets you.

Trump fully embraced these clients and gave them practically anything they
wanted, including reneging on the nuclear deal and ratcheting up tensions with
Iran. Now that Biden is in office, the clients have reverted to their predictable
song and dance about abandonment fears, and it seems that the administration
is only too eager to “reassure” them that the US still backs them
to the hilt. That is why there has been no meaningful pressure on the Saudi
and Emirati governments over Yemen or any of their other abuses, and that is
why the flow of weapons to both governments continues. It is also why the Biden
administration has been so stubborn in refusing to offer Iran even token sanctions
relief. Biden is more concerned to keep US clients happy than he is to salvage
the nuclear deal.

There are powerful vested interests that want to keep the US mired in the Middle
East indefinitely, including weapons manufacturers, lobbyists working on behalf
of client states, and domestic ideological factions that want the US to take
their preferred side in regional quarrels. Unless a president is prepared to
challenge them and take some political risks, they will prevail in making sure
that nothing changes. Biden has signaled throughout the year that he has no
intention of seriously challenging these interests on any issue, and now administration
officials are delivering that message to the client governments.

As long as the US remains entangled in the affairs of the Middle East, it is
just a matter of time before another president embarks on new ruinous military
interventions there. The US military presence enables the waging of unnecessary
wars by American forces and support for the reckless wars of US clients. That
presence is a destabilizing force that invites hostility and generates new threats.
The illusion that the region is “too important” to leave keeps the
US trapped in a prison of its own making. Accepting that illusion as the truth
dooms the US to pursue irrational policies in the service of other countries’
interests at our expense. Americans need to recognize that the US does not need
to be ensnared in the conflicts of the Middle East, and if we choose to leave
it will make our country more secure.

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor and weekly columnist for Antiwar.com
and maintains his own site at Eunomia.
He is former senior editor at
The American Conservative. He has been
published in the
New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World
Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The
American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week.
He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster,
PA. Follow him on Twitter.

Source link